On November 3, the Alibaba Global Mathematics Competition Organizing Committee announced that a 17-year-old mathematical genius girl violated regulations in the preliminary round and won the prize with the help of her teacher Wang Moumou, so the two were disqualified from the competition.
Netizens saw it and said: There is something fishy.
The final results of Jiang Ping’s second competition were originally going to be announced on August 22, but by August 22, they had not been announced.
Everyone knows that this matter is not simple! After conducting comprehensive evidence collection, the
investigation team found that both Jiang Ping and the teacher violated the rules and had problems with revealing topics to each other. Therefore, the two were disqualified from the competition, which was equivalent to them not having any ranking in the competition.
This approach gives people a feeling of many secrets. First of all, what is the result of the competition? Regardless of whether the two disclosed the topic, should Alibaba announce the final results of the competition?
Even if the competition is to be canceled, it will not be canceled with the result of this "arbitrary power". If the two people do not score high in the competition, then everyone will naturally be convinced.
However, the final results of the two were not announced, and they were directly disqualified from the competition, which was equivalent to invalidating their rankings. No wonder netizens are curious, is there anything fishy in it? The counterattack of
has brought "sense of pressure" to many people, forcing Alibaba to adopt more extreme methods to curb the development of the situation?
I think back then, after Jiang Ping, a technical secondary school student, won the 12th place grand prize in the preliminary round, the entire Internet was abuzz. Many people even worried that she was cheating?
html In June, the Lianshui County Government in Jiangsu Province publicly responded to netizens that Jiang Ping's score of 83 points in the monthly exam was true. She participated in the Alibaba competition with a borrowed computer.
These confirmed news made netizens have more doubts. Did she successfully get a good ranking with the help of her teacher?
But why did she get a higher ranking than the teacher?
801 mathematics masters from around the world participated in the competition. The average age was over 22 years old, but she was only 17 years old, and she came from a technical secondary school.
Once she really succeeds in her counterattack, it means that her strength can be equal to that of some students from Tsinghua University and Peking University.
The contrast is too great! This has also repeatedly pushed her to the forefront. Many scholars believe that the country has its own talents. This phenomenon is completely understandable.
Some people also said that her monthly test scores were not excellent, so how could she learn such difficult math questions?
Although Alibaba and major media have confirmed that the two are not strong enough and did not rely on their own efforts to get the preliminary rankings, there is something fishy hidden behind this.
The rankings obtained by the two in the preliminary round are true. So who is more powerful, the teacher or the student? Can you control everything from behind?
Why did Jiang Ping dare to challenge? If they don't understand this knowledge, how can they solve these questions within the specified time?
Since we want to prove their innocence, shouldn't there be a live broadcast to let viewers across the country see if they really understand the questions in the competition? The results of the
survey were released, but it caused more doubts among the audience. Is it because the competition system is not perfect enough, or has it touched some people's cheese?
Disclaimer: The article is originally created by Master Lin Entertainment Team. Plagiarism and reprinting are prohibited. The pictures are from the Internet and are not necessarily related to the article. If there is any infringement, please contact us for deletion.
