"Did I read it correctly? I saw Tongzhuo live broadcasting, with a lot of fans, and many people buying gifts..." "In the corner where no one cares, Tongzhuo is bringing goods during the live broadcast. There are many key points. People support and support him, does he still have so many fans?" Recently, artist Tong Zhuo, who exposed himself in the live broadcast of college entrance examination fraud, started live broadcasting to sell goods on the platform, which caused controversy among netizens.
Judging from netizensā screenshots of the live broadcast room, Tongzhuoās live broadcast room is not low in popularity, with nearly 50,000 hits. During the live broadcast, he sang and interacted with the audience, and brought goods for sale. The accountās product window displays with There were 2,389 sales, and 618 people followed.
After the college entrance examination fraud scandal, he switched to live broadcasting
Netizens questioned his comeback and was blacklisted
Tong Zhuo was originally a bachelor's degree graduate of the Central Academy of Drama. He became popular with the variety show "Sound into the Heart" and won the attention and love of many viewers. In May 2020, Tong Zhuo revealed in a live chat that he used some means in 2013 to change his identity as a former student to a fresh graduate to take the college entrance examination and finally pass the Chinese drama. His tone was quite complacent. Relevant video clips quickly caused an uproar. After the incident, Tongzhuo once again live broadcasted "choked" and said that being an artist is not free to speak. Many netizens demanded a thorough investigation into Tongzhuo's suspected identity modification fraud in the college entrance examination. On June 12, 2020, the Discipline Inspection Commission of Linfen City, Shanxi Province The Supervisory Committee announced the investigation results of the case. More than a dozen people who falsified the identity of Tongzhuo as fresh graduates and went through the formalities of probationary party membership were severely punished. After the public controversy over college entrance examination fraud, Tong Zhuo's acting career was hit hard, but he did not completely disappear from public view. In January 2022, Tong Zhuo said that he sued the Shanxi Provincial Admissions and Examination Management Center on the grounds that "it was not me" The fraud in the college entrance examination was caused by some people cheating on my college entrance examination." "I only saw the administrative punishment imposed on me by the examination center on the Internet. No one had contacted me for investigation before, and the content and basis of the punishment were not related to me. "My experience is seriously inconsistent with my memory."
In April this year, Guo Han, the operator of Tongzhuo Studio, complained that Tongzhuo owed more than 120,000 yuan in debt and once again caused heated discussion. After the public controversy over cheating in the college entrance examination was exposed, the studio helped Tongzhuo "guerrilla" in trying to hold a ticket sales meeting, but the meeting ultimately failed to take place. Some netizens raised doubts about
's live broadcast and asked whether it was a comeback move. However, he was quickly blocked by the administrator of the live broadcast room. Some netizens said on social platforms, "What did I say in the live broadcast room?" Some people were also blocked after watching his live broadcast. "Many netizens expressed that it is difficult to accept Tongzhuo's live broadcast, "It has a bad impact if you have to rely on traffic." "College entrance examination fraud can also make money through live broadcast, and young people can see it. What do you think?" He also pointed out that in the live broadcast, he called himself a "bean purifier" and asked the audience to consume, and compared cheating in the college entrance examination to "pooping his pants as a child", which made people feel uncomfortable. Some netizens spoke for Tong Zhuo: "Is it necessary to kill them all with a stick?" Another netizen pointed the finger at the platform, "He has been broadcasting like this for so long, and the platform doesn't care about it?"
Lawyer talks:
It may be a comeback in disguise, but the degree of regulation of bad artists still needs to be clarified
Some bad artists who have caused controversy due to negative events have completely disappeared, but some have quietly returned to the public through online social platforms, Jiangsu Fade Dongheng Lawyer Lan Tianbin, a partner of the firm, believes that bad artists posting short videos on social media platforms and carrying out live broadcasts are actually a "comeback in disguise." "In recent years, relevant departments have increased the management of artists and increased the regulation of bad artists, mainly through policy documents and industry self-discipline."
According to the Online Audiovisual Program Management Department of the State Administration of Radio and Television The "Notice on Strengthening the Management of Game Live Broadcasting on Online Audio-Visual Program Platforms" issued by other organizations states, "It is strictly prohibited for illegal and unscrupulous personnel to use live broadcasts to speak out. Online live broadcast platforms must strictly control the selection of anchors and guests, and insist on political literacy, moral conduct, Artistic level and social evaluation are used as selection criteria.Those who have incorrect political stances, violate laws and regulations, or violate public order and good customs will not be allowed to be employed. "
The platform should not provide a platform for bad artists, and the simple sentiments of the public do not allow bad artists to reappear to make money. However, the impact of bad artists' bad deeds on different people's hearts is not the same. For the same artist, some people cannot Accepting the opportunity to appear again, I think it will bring a bad demonstration effect, but some people think that no one can make mistakes, and accepting punishment should also give the bad artist a chance to be a new person, Lan Tianbin. He said that at present, the definition of bad artists in policy documents and industry self-regulation is relatively vague. It is necessary to carry out different levels of regulations for different bad deeds. We can neither kill people with a stick, nor be overly tolerant or even condone bad artists. Suggestions should be made to formulate and improve regulations on bad artists that are realistic, lenient and strict, and highly operable.
Yangzi Evening News/Ziniu News reporter Shen Zhao
Proofreading by Li Haihui
.