Teacher Wang Yang was nominated for the Best Actor at this Magnolia Award for his role as Shen Tunan in "The Storm Chaser", and then fell into controversy. A large number of drama fans believe that Shen Tunan, played by Mr. Wang Yang in the drama, is a well-deserved supporting actor and should compete in the Magnolia Award for Best Supporting Actor instead of being nominated for the Magnolia Award for Best Actor. track.
Therefore, a large number of fans are asking who is the leading actor and supporting actor in the TV series "Storm Chaser". However, as of June 11, this inquiry has not received any positive response from the director, producer, copyright holder or even the Magnolia Award submitter.
What drama fans are waiting for is the controversial "wearing a hat" statement by some drama critics and teachers. Some drama critic teachers said that those who ask this question are those who are the sticks and those who are the soldiers. To respond to these people, they use their own "dog-walking time" and so on. My very respected friend Zeng Nianqun, a famous film and television drama critic, also has this dynamic content:
"The Storm Chaser" is not only shortlisted for the Wang Yang Performance Award.
drama series, director, photography, and art are all shortlisted.
This is the result of collective creation.
A bunch of dusty people are biting people everywhere,
will do no harm to Wang Yibo .
Even if "Storm Chaser" fails in the end,
the creative power of the team is obvious to all.
is looking forward to their next one.
I won’t mention the name of the drama critic teacher in “Dog Time” because I don’t know the teacher and it would be inappropriate to mention his name. I know Teacher Zeng Nianqun, and we have become friends. I often read Mr. Zeng’s drama reviews. Therefore, I mention Mr. Zeng and want to seriously answer the questions and opinions raised by Mr. Zeng. It is out of respect between friends and will not be distorted and interpreted as provocation. This is more like a heart-to-heart exchange between old friends.
Mr. Zeng said that "Wind Chaser" was shortlisted for multiple awards at this Magnolia Award, and it was the result of collective creation. This is really a true statement. This TV series, especially in terms of photography and art, is simply worthy of awards. Even if it is not given the Magnolia Award, it will be given other awards. Collective creation deserves respect. This can be agreed upon, and no one denies this.
So, can fans of the collectively created TV series ask some questions? For example, who is the supporting actor in this TV series? I think Mr. Zeng should know better than me. Whether it is a collective creation or an individual creation, once the TV series is released, online, and broadcast, it will be able to accept these questions from the fans of the drama. It’s not too much to ask who is the male protagonist or the male supporting actor. When we drama critics write reviews of film and television dramas, will we not praise the advantages of a drama and criticize its shortcomings just because it is a collective creation? Obviously not.
The sentence "A bunch of dusty people are biting people everywhere" completely shocked me. Saying this, I face many problems. For example, who is a bunch of gray fans? The person who makes this statement needs to clearly demonstrate. It is common sense that whoever proposes it shall give evidence. What words did these "grey fans" say? How can these words be considered as "biting people everywhere"? Zeng Lao's argument requires solid argumentative materials and detailed argumentation. Without this evidence and argument, the argument is invalid and is suspected of slander.
If Mr. Zeng could carefully read the content of the questions raised by drama fans, he might understand their questions instead of thinking that the questioners are gray fans. First of all, many of the questioners are not even fans, let alone fans of any color. Secondly, the question fans are asking is actually a very simple question: who is the male protagonist and who is the male supporting actor in "Storm Chaser". The scriptwriter only needs to answer this question in a reasonable way. However, as of now, has anyone from the scriptwriters come forward to answer the question?
obviously doesn't. this is the key of the problem.A group of "Storm Chaser" fans who ask questions have become "left", "red", "dog time", and "grey fans"... This is a bit like not talking about the problem, but "wearing a hat" for the fans who ask questions. hat" means. This cannot be justified in terms of common sense. Why can't we just talk about who the male lead and the male supporting actor are in "Storm Chaser"? Is it difficult to talk about this issue? I think it's not difficult.
The drama critic of "Walking the Dog" said that in "The Storm Chaser", Shen Tunan's scene length is only 10% less than Wei Ruolai, so this drama has two male protagonists. This is a content with arguments, arguments and argumentation process. Fans of the drama have put forward their opinions based on this content. For example, 10% of the data is not accurate. In "The Storm Chaser", Wei Ruolai's plot duration is: 12:22:06. The plot duration of Shen Tunan is: 9:12:06. Drama fans rely on intelligent AI to store data in seconds. Moreover, it needs to be pointed out that because the statistics are based on intelligent AI, the large number of scenes where Wei Ruonan was tortured cannot be included in the statistics. There are also some things that intelligent AI cannot do.
Based on this data, we can see that the length of Shen Tunan's scenes is 34.4% worse than the length of Wei Ruolai's scenes. I'm really not good at math, so I don't know if the calculation is correct. If this is wrong, I hope friends who are good at mathematics can calculate, based on the real data above, what percentage difference there is in the plot length of the two characters.
At the same time, many fans of the drama who asked questions also proposed new ways and methods to distinguish the male protagonist and the male supporting character, and let one of the characters go offline to see if it would affect the plot of the second half of the drama. This method can of course be discussed. However, looking at "Storm Chaser" in this way, in the last 8 episodes, Shen Tunan's role is no longer necessary, and if Wei Ruolai's role is gone, it will be the end. These discussions are actually based on one core question: who is the leading actor in "Storm Chaser" and who is the supporting actor. Such discussions are valuable.
The drama critic of "Walking the Dog" also said: Previously, Huang Zhizhong was awarded the title of Best Viewer for " The Righteous Way in the World Is Vicissitudes of Life ", and Bo Han was awarded the title of Best Viewer for "The Beautiful Era of Daughters-in-law". These two are supporting roles. After this statement appeared, I wrote an article to discuss the errors in logic and common sense. Starting from the 21st Magnolia Awards, the Best Actor Award has been changed to Best Actor and Best Supporting Actor, and the Best Actress Award has been changed to Best Actress and Best Supporting Actress. The two dramas "Righteousness in the World" and "A Beautiful Era for Wifes" were shortlisted for the Magnolia Awards before the 21st session. They were shortlisted for Best Actor and Best Actress. This is the same as Best Actor. The leading role and the best actress are different.
Therefore, after the 21st Magnolia Awards, the leading actor will go to the Best Actor track, and the supporting actor will go to the Best Supporting Actor track. They can no longer hold the Best Actor and Best Actor awards before the 21st Magnolia Awards. The best actress is here to take advantage of the situation. In the past, of course, the Best Actor and Best Actress categories did not differentiate between male protagonists and supporting actors, and female protagonists and supporting female actors. After the 21st edition, the awards have been distinguished by themselves, and there is no room for confusion.
Some people also talk about why Wang Yang was not shortlisted for Best Actor because he is also the lead actor in "The Storm Chaser". This point can also be refuted by the shortlist of Best Supporting Actor for this Magnolia Award. Among this year's nominees for Best Supporting Actor, several are leading actors. Obviously, the leading actor, the male lead, and the female lead are not exactly the same. Many of the leading actors are just supporting actors.
After the dynamic content of teacher Zeng Nianqun was released, director Gao Qunshu left a message: Because of this noisy incident, there is a high probability that the show will not be successful.
I am also more inclined to think that "Storm Chaser" will fail at this Magnolia Award. My personal feeling is that the Magnolia Award jury is also very passive now. Obviously, to answer this question, we need to face who is the male protagonist and who is the male supporting actor in "Storm Chaser". In this matter, let me prove that Wang Yang is the male protagonist, but I can't prove it because he is really not the male protagonist.If I were on the Magnolia Awards jury, I would definitely contact the party that submitted the award and ask them to come out and prove it quickly. If there is no problem with the submission, they will prove who the male protagonist and the supporting actor are. If there is a problem with the submission, apologize immediately, otherwise , no award will be given to him. The failure of "Wind Chaser" to achieve anything is probably an attitude of the Magnolia Awards - an attitude of urging the dramatists to respond positively to the fans' inquiries.
At the same time, director Gao Qunshu proposed "this noisy incident", because Gao Lao did not clearly define what the incident was, so I dare to help Gao Lao define who is the male protagonist and who is the Magnolia Award winner for "The Storm Chaser" After the male supporting actor controversy, the drama's producers did not directly answer the fans' questions, and some drama critics actually came up with incidents such as Zuo Nasha, Hong Nasha, Dog Walking Time, and Gray Fan.
Regarding this matter, my opinion is that if we present facts and reason from the beginning, how can we make "Storm Chaser" useless? Whether it's a fan of the show or a fan, it's reasonable to ask who is the male protagonist and who is the male supporting actor in "Storm Chaser". Isn't it a good idea for us to argue seriously and reason seriously? Does putting a hat on the questioner eliminate the problem? This is still common sense.
Therefore, I think the most normal solution to this problem is to return to the problem itself and respond to the questions of drama fans. As for us drama critics, what we should do is argument, argument, argument. We can argue that Shen Tunan is the male protagonist, or we can argue that Wei Ruolai is the well-deserved male protagonist. As long as we argue and be reasonable, we are already on the road to seeking the truth, and the correct answer will come. We middle-aged and elderly drama critics have an obligation to set an example for young drama fans. If we present facts and reason, young people will learn from us and present facts and reason. We put hats on others, but they still tell us facts and reason, which shows that our group of young people has no quality. (Text/Ma Qingyun)
