Recently, a netizen who claimed to be a young lawyer commented on a lawyer-related discussion thread, "Let's do some live broadcasting." He said that his monthly income as a lawyer is 5,000 yuan, and his live broadcast income is about 20,000 yuan. "Without live broadcast, I live in Shanghai." Don’t go down” caused heated discussion.
Controversial pictures posted online
According to the netizen's self-introduction, reporters found that the Shanghai Lawyer Industry Credit Information Service Platform does have a lawyer named Dong with the same name, and the staff of his law firm also confirmed that the netizen is one of its lawyers.
reporters noticed that Dong had posted videos combining dance and legal education on multiple social platforms. Some netizens believed that the user directed and performed a "premeditated hype"; others thought that after watching the video, "It's not just a normal dance, just a little bit charming"; some netizens said, "The female lawyer rubs What Bian danced was not ruining herself, but the professional image of the entire female lawyer, and even the professional image of the entire lawyer group.”
html On April 22, the reporter also contacted Dong’s law firm, and Wang, one of the relevant persons in charge of the law firm. Yan (pseudonym) told reporters that the law firm has criticized, suggested and taught Dong, and has communicated with Dong from the perspective of caring for the healthy growth of young lawyers and social responsibility, hoping that she can learn from it."It can be seen from the video on her homepage of station B that she has undergone rectification." Wang Yan also pointed out that Dong had some inappropriate and irrational responses in the clarification video released on April 21, so she was punished criticize. Dong also listened to the advice of Wang Yanhe and other persons in charge of the law firm and removed the response video from Station B. "It is inappropriate to publish these videos without our consent and should not be published in this form."
Wang Yan told reporters that after communication, Dong had realized her problem and the law firm would not fire her. "For Law firms are the main unit and are responsible for the growth of young lawyers. "Wang Yan said that to a certain extent, law firms have made certain mistakes and did not provide particularly good protection for young lawyers. They will be given some suggestions and advice. teach.
Comment: What should be discussed more than whether to brush aside the issue is the playful attitude of female lawyers towards legal consultation.
To say too much is to say too much, this time, the Internet celebrity female lawyer who has rushed to the hot search can be said to have seen it.
According to reports, recently, a post "A Shanghai lawyer cannot survive because he earns 5,000 yuan a month, but earns 20,000 yuan a month by doing live broadcasts" has caused heated discussion. Later, the blogger responded with a video saying that it was just a joke he made at the time, but it was reposted by many people and spread the rumor that he was a 38-year-old married female lawyer who was doing a live broadcast. He hoped that major marketing accounts would stop reposting the rumor and defend his own business. Apology for remarks. Looking at the videos posted by this blogger, there are indeed videos that combine dance and law education.
Suddenly, controversy arose. Some people think that this reflects the current living conditions of young lawyers; some think that as long as it does not violate the rules of the platform, there is no harm in dancing; others think that this is a discredit to the legal profession. There are many opinions, but it can be seen that when the word "borderline" is uttered, whether it is a borderline is no longer that important.
In the Internet age, there are many lawyers who have emerged from the industry, including Lao Han, who has gained millions of followers in half a month, and Long Fei, the "scumbag crusher"... They are basically based on professional legal interpretation and providing legal advice to clients. Winning reputation seems to be in line with people's normal imagination of the image of a lawyer. But this female lawyer who is out of the entertainment industry frequently shows dancing clips in her videos, which is somewhat unconventional. Naturally, she is more likely to be watched and scrutinized. Therefore, whether it is outrageous language or outrageous behavior, you cannot just enjoy the traffic brought by the outrageous behavior without bearing the corresponding consequences.
It was during this controversy that I started watching her videos. Her image is different from that of a lawyer, not just because of dancing. What is more worthy of discussion than whether the controversy is sidelined is the lack of professional knowledge she presented, and even more so her teasing attitude towards case analysis.
As a lawyer, when facing inquiries from netizens, she sometimes says, "I'm sorry. Is there anyone here who understands law and has done similar practice (to help answer questions)?"It is understandable that everyone has blind spots in knowledge, but when a law enforcement lawyer says this, it makes people feel that she is lacking in professional knowledge. This lack will also make people question whether it is because of insufficient professional ability, so they have to rely on dance and other forms to cover up or cover up the professional shortcomings?
What's more important is that when netizens consulted, she seemed to have more of a cannibalistic mentality rather than the serious attitude of solving problems that a lawyer should have. In a video clip that was screenshotted and forwarded by netizens, she was laughing and making various exaggerated expressions when a 17-year-old boy was consulting on a minor rape case. If dancing can still be discussed, then the joking attitude during the consultation is incomprehensible - is a possible rape case really that funny?
Similar behavior does not exist only in one video. The covers are all like "Do male college students have to pay child support if they get a young woman pregnant?" "Is it illegal to pretend to be a stewardess and sell original stockings?" "Can the money paid for surrogacy be returned? 》 and other alternative titles, although on the one hand it may be to attract the public, on the other hand it may be due to personality reasons, and similar netizens are more willing to consult her, but I still want to ask, are these cases true? If it is true, have lawyers considered the social impact of treating suspected criminal inquiries in this way and making it public at the same time?
These issues are actually more worthy of a professional review and discussion. As for the majority of netizens, they can raise questions, but they also need to remain rational, and they should not be prone to online violence against this female lawyer. Talking about things and discussing things as they are, this is the personal quality that should be achieved in the Internet era. (According to Red Star News)
