reported on November 1 On November 1, Beijing time, Gao Yunxiang and Wang Jing entered the fifth day of trial in the Australian sexual assault case. Through the fierce confrontation between the prosecution and the defense, a jury consisting of 5 women and 7 men will eventually be formed. To determine whether the two are guilty.
is different from the previous few days, the female party used an interpreter throughout the entire process and no longer made her statement in English. The
trial was postponed by one hour compared with the previous few days, and the trial was held at 11 am, but Gao Yunxiang had arrived at 10 o'clock accompanied by a lawyer.
The defense lawyer questioned the discrepancies in the multiple testimonies given by the parties from the beginning. It is reported that after the incident, the litigant provided five testimonies to the police. The defense lawyer pointed out that the first one was different from the third one. But the person concerned explained that the first one was written under extreme fear, because these two people are famous in China, especially Gao Yunxiang, they are powerful and powerful.
During this period, Gao Yunxiang and Wang Jing have been staring at the screen closely, watching the actions and reactions of the parties involved. Wang Jing and the translator got close together and listened carefully to the translation. Judge
criticized the defense lawyer for being unfair.
About an hour after the trial, the judge announced a five-minute adjournment and pointed out to Gao Yunxiang’s defense lawyer: “I think you just played selective clips, and some clips are too short. , It’s not enough to understand the context. I think it’s unfair. If you continue to take this out of context, I may remind the prosecution to object.” Judge
further pointed out that the actions of the defense lawyer may cause the content of the trial record to fail to reflect the incident. The whole picture may have an impact on the jury's verdict. After the trial restarted, the defense lawyer accepted the judge's suggestion, and the time spent watching the video was significantly longer.
When the KTV surveillance video continued to be broadcast in the courtroom earlier, the defense lawyer pointed out that someone had left near midnight and the client could leave politely. The woman responded: "I answered yesterday, my company Responsible for all Australian affairs. From March 23 to 27, my company is responsible for everything. I must be present." The following is the court situation (continuous update):
11: 16am
The female victim appeared in a white long-sleeved pullover. In the video.
Gao Yunxiang, Queen’s Counsel, Murugan Thangaraj (hereinafter referred to as the "defense"), interrogated the police record of the female client (hereinafter referred to as the "female").
argued: "Before this, the prosecutor asked you, when you went to the king's room, who would you think would be in it? You answered the crew, "them", but this part of the answer is your first The police transcripts are inconsistent. In the first police transcript, what you said was'Wang told you Gao Yunxiang will come down.'" Female
: "The first transcript was made under extreme fear. I was under a lot of mental stress. , I can’t even speak a complete sentence. The third transcript is the most accurate state.”
argued: “In the third transcript, you mentioned,'I went to the Manly police station and made the first transcript. The first recorded testimony is accurate, right?" Female
: "I have already answered your question. The first recorded testimony was made under extreme fear, Gao and Wang, especially Gao Zai China has a lot of energy and is very wealthy, and I am just an ordinary person in Australia. I didn’t know what decision to make at the time.” (When the female subject answered this question, the word order was slow)
argued: “The third testimony in the fifth testimony In the paragraph, you mentioned that'I have provided 4 transcripts to the police before, and they are all accurate information as far as I can,' right? (The female victim did not have the transcript. After the prosecutor confirmed it, the victim said yes)
Argument: "Before you and Wang Jing went back to the room on the day of the incident, you knew Gao Hui was the only person in the room, right? "
female: "I don't agree with you. Because I said yesterday that Mr. Gao is aThe lead actor, there is always a team around him, no matter during the filming period or during the break, he has his assistant and manager around him, including the assistant when he goes to the bathroom. "The
surveillance video was played until 03-26-2018 23:57:30
argued: "Everyone stand up and have a drink together, right? "
female: "Yes. "
argued: "Did anyone give a speech at that time?" "
female: "I don't remember. "
argued: "Did anyone leave the room at this time?" "
female: "I don't remember. "
argued: "It's late now, and there are people toasting together. Wouldn't it be impolite to leave at this time?" Female
: "You asked me many similar questions yesterday. As the representative of Australia, I need to take care of everyone. Our company is in charge of shooting on the 23-27. I must be present. "
argued:" But you replied to your husband a few minutes ago that you are going home? (The defense lawyer withdrew the question) The
surveillance video was broadcast to 00:00:00
to argue: "Did you and Wang chat after everyone toasted?" "
female: "Yes. "
argued: "The queen put her hand on your thigh, right? "
female: "I didn't see it in the video. "
video replay
argument: "Really? "
female: "The table is blocked in the video. (The victim asks 3 times) Is it your hypothesis again? "(The judge told the lawyer of the female victim that he could not answer his question) The
surveillance video was played until 00:02:26
argued: "Wang is talking with you, Wang put his hand on your right shoulder?" "
female: "Yes. The
surveillance video was played until 00:07:19
argued: "At that time Gao was singing, you were chatting with everyone, right?"
female: "Not only Gao was singing, but a duet with a lady."
surveillance video played To 00:07:55
argued: "Are you looking at your cell phone?"
female: "Yes."
surveillance video played to 00:08:09
argued: "At this time you have read your husband's information , Right?"
female: "You keep asking me if I read my husband's information, I don't understand what you mean, I don't understand your intentions. I answered it yesterday, and I can't remember exactly when I saw the husband's information. "
argued: "Then did you reply to your husband?"
female: "You keep asking the same question."
argued: "Did you reply?"
female: "I didn't."
surveillance video playback To 00:08:34
argued: "Wang was holding you, right?"
Female: "Can't you see? He is holding another actress with his other hand, it's just a friendly expression."
Argument: "Then you said in the police record that Wang was uncomfortable and scared at KTV?" Female
: "I told the police that after a certain moment, Wang made me feel uncomfortable. I can't remember the exact time. "
argued: "Madam, but you told the police that Wang made you uncomfortable when you went out to smoke with Wang before? It's been an hour ago." Female
: "This is the same as mine. The answer does not conflict, because what you are asking me now is that I am uncomfortable at this specific time, and I can’t remember the specific uncomfortable time." The
surveillance video was played to 00:11:03
to argue: "You and again Wang exchanges, is he also holding you, right?"
female: "Yes."
It is reported that on the 28th, Gao Yunxiang and Wang Jing were suspected of sexual assault. The final trial was held. It is the fifth day and the female victim is on the second day. He appeared, made statements and answered many details that night, and the content of the text messages with her husband was also exposed. In addition, the court opened KTV and other places to monitor the scene, and the female victim was cross-examined by the defense lawyer.
(responsible editor: Ma Wenjing_NBJS9027)
