In the past two days, the controversial literary film " Hidden in the Dust " was suddenly removed from the shelves of the entire network. Many people feel more and more about the "destiny of wheat" in the film.
Perhaps, the fate of this film being taken off the shelves, just like the wheat destined to be cut by a sickle, has long been doomed.
Speaking of which, this is not the first time "Hidden in the Dust" has been taken off the shelves.
As early as before the Mid-Autumn Festival, "Hidden in the Dust" was once "perfectly closed" by offline theaters. At that time, it had just counterattacked into a dark horse in the summer, and there were still 23 days before the key expired. The box office of
"Hidden in the Dust" finally settled at 110 million.
This achievement is really not worth mentioning when compared with "Wolf Warrior 2", "Hello, Li Huanying ", " Wandering Earth " and other heavyweight movies that have won more than 5 billion box office.
But the impact it brings is phenomenal. In addition to
's high rating of 8.5 points, it is also a "miracle of literary and artistic box office counter-attacks".
If there are praises, there will be doubts. In addition to being criticized by the audience for " is out of reality and vilified farmers", in the entertainment circle, "Hidden in the Dust" is also unpopular.
has very few propagandists, and no big coffee stands for it, as if there was a collective silence all of a sudden.
Some filmmakers once commented on it: literary films are used to realize artistic ideals, and do not want to make money through literary films. These doubts,
, may have influenced its fate invisibly, making it "abandoned" by the times.
In fact, "Hidden in the Dust" really can't represent all the farmers, but as long as there are minorities like them, there should be works to speak for them.
Even if there are only one percent of the bitter farmers left in the world, they are not qualified to blame this movie.
Second, those inspiring forces in "Hidden in the Dust".
Strictly speaking, this is also the first film in China that focuses on the countryside and tells the stories of farmers.
Once upon a time, "Hidden in the Dust" was praised by People's Daily , and praised it for giving ordinary people the power to live a strong life.
Indeed, outside the city, there are thousands of peasants like Ma Youtie and Cao Guiying, who passionately love life and write a beautiful chapter of love. This kind of power that blooms in the mud is precisely the belief that many people are losing today.
In addition, the marginal groups they represent are also worthy of our deep consideration. When
was interviewed by the media, the director of the film, Li Ruijun once said this:
is more willing to believe that in "Hidden in the Dust", director Li Ruijun wants to It is this "prejudice" that is critical.
Ma Youtie, is an honest old bachelor who has done most of his life for his brother, except for the donkey , he has nothing.
Cao Guiying, lame, incontinent, incontinent, incapable of labor and infertility, living in a shack, became the burden of brother and sister-in-law.
Because of their marginality, no one will ask, where is their future? how their lives will end. The only one
is willing to accept them is this yellow land.
They can't represent the whole of the countryside, but they really live in every village. In them, many people can even see the shadow of their parents.
Now, the movie "Hidden in the Dust" has also become a marginal person who is disliked. The only one who is willing to accept it is this yellow land.