Qichacha APP shows that recently, TSMC affiliate Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (TSM.N) has added a number of court announcements, all of which are disputes over confirmation of non-infringement of patent rights. Municipal Intermediate People's Court.
Legal Litigation Information
The plaintiff in this case involves a number of Apple companies in China, including: Apple Electronic Products Trading (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Apple Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Suzhou Xingzhou Street Branch, Apple Company , Apple Computer Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., and the defendant is Giant Technology Co., Ltd.
Jiupai News noticed that TSMC was involved in multiple cases of the same type as a third party. The third party has an independent litigation status in the litigation and belongs to the generalized party. In litigation, as a third party, it can litigate with the plaintiff and defendant in this lawsuit, or assist one party to litigate with the other party.
According to the Qichacha APP, Giant Technology was established in Taiwan, China in 1983. Its business scope includes the design, manufacture and sales of optical storage media; the design, manufacture and sales of advanced packaging products and related components. In addition, Giant Technology has more than 70 patent information, including multiple international patents .
The three companies involved in the case
Regarding this case, lawyer Gan Linxin of Beijing Dacheng (Hangzhou) Law Firm believes that in most infringement lawsuits, one party generally sues the other party for infringement, and in intellectual property cases, one party will sue for "confirmation of non-infringement" The reason for such cases is that intellectual property cases, especially those involving patent infringement, are very professional. After the parties themselves received a infringement warning issued by the right holder, the right holder did not pass the legal means within a reasonable period of time. When seeking protection, the parties themselves may not be able to judge whether they have infringed the patent rights of the other party. This behavior is in a state of instability. In order to eliminate this state of instability, the party receiving the warning can take the initiative to sue the court. , ask the court to confirm whether it is not infringing.
Jiupai news intern reporter Lin Feng
[Breaking news] Please contact the reporter on WeChat: linghaojizhe
[Source: Jiupai News]
declares: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author, if the source is wrong or your legal rights are violated, you can email Get in touch with us and we will deal with it promptly. Email address: [email protected]