The late British Princess Diana was not only the "People's Princess" but also a "fashion icon". In her short life, she left many classic images.
This includes the dress she wore when attending a charity dinner in 1987. She wore a dark purple velvet evening dress and an extra-long pearl necklace with a cross-shaped pendant, which made the overall look a bit more sacred. , and also made her look more graceful and gorgeous.
This necklace almost disappeared after it was worn by Princess Diana. It was not until 37 years later that it appeared on the body of the American reality show actress Kim Kardashian , but it also triggered widespread criticism...
On the evening of November 2, local time, Kim Kardashian attended the "Art Film Festival" held at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art.
Unlike Princess Diana, the 43-year-old reality show actress chose a white evening dress with the skirt open to her navel. It was obvious that she wanted the amethyst hanging around her neck to be The cross is more prominent. It can be understood that she is paying tribute to Princess Diana, but of course it can also be understood that she is simply showing off.
But in any case, Kim's move was unsuccessful, and social media was filled with criticism of her, with people evaluating her fashion decisions as "tacky" and "ruining classics."
"This is the best example, a perfect contrast between classics and garbage." Some netizens wrote. Someone else wrote sarcastically: "Diana would wear it better. Doesn't Kim have a piece of clothing that can completely cover herself?" Someone else said bluntly: "She wants to establish a relationship with the royal family too much. Contacted."
In view of the special meaning represented by the cross, many people criticized King: "If you are going to wear such a sacred jewelry, at least show some respect like Diana..."
It's worth it. It should be noted that Princess Diana borrowed this necklace from a Palestinian-British businessman named Naim Attallah, but now Kim is the owner of this necklace.
In January last year, Jin commissioned others to buy this classic necklace from a Sotheby's auction for US$197,453 (approximately 1.41 million RMB). An insider said at the time: "Jin is honored to own the exquisite jewelry once worn by the late British Princess, which adds a new color to her collection of historical memorabilia."
The pendant is the most dazzling part of this necklace, produced by Composed of square-cut amethysts and round-cut diamonds, the total weight of the diamonds is 5.25 carats.
In fact, when the news of Jin buying this necklace appeared, it triggered a series of controversies. In view of her previous performance and personal image, people thought that Jin buying a necklace worn by Princess Diana was arty. .
In addition, because she also broke a classic dress of Marilyn Monroe during her lifetime (Jin insisted that she did not wear it out), so people firmly believe that she does not deserve to have these special things, even if She can afford it.
The original money could be used to match the necklace with an elegant evening dress to retaliate against people's previous criticism of her, but the reality is that she has to wear such a skirt, which is quite "discussing". The late British Princess Diana was not only the "People's Princess" but also a "fashion icon". In her short life, she left many classic images. This includes the dress she wore when attending a charity dinner in 1987. She wore a dark purple velvet evening dress and an extra-long pearl necklace with a cross-shaped pendant, which made the overall look a bit more sacred. , and also made her look more graceful and gorgeous. This necklace almost disappeared after it was worn by Princess Diana. It was not until 37 years later that it appeared on the body of the American reality show actress Kim Kardashian , but it also triggered widespread criticism... On the evening of November 2, local time, Kim Kardashian attended the "Art Film Festival" held at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art. Unlike Princess Diana, the 43-year-old reality show actress chose a white evening dress with the skirt open to her navel. It was obvious that she wanted the amethyst hanging around her neck to be The cross is more prominent. It can be understood that she is paying tribute to Princess Diana, but of course it can also be understood that she is simply showing off. But in any case, Kim's move was unsuccessful, and social media was filled with criticism of her, with people evaluating her fashion decisions as "tacky" and "ruining classics." "This is the best example, a perfect contrast between classics and garbage." Some netizens wrote. Someone else wrote sarcastically: "Diana would wear it better. Doesn't Kim have a piece of clothing that can completely cover herself?" Someone else said bluntly: "She wants to establish a relationship with the royal family too much. Contacted." In view of the special meaning represented by the cross, many people criticized King: "If you are going to wear such a sacred jewelry, at least show some respect like Diana..." It's worth it. It should be noted that Princess Diana borrowed this necklace from a Palestinian-British businessman named Naim Attallah, but now Kim is the owner of this necklace. In January last year, Jin commissioned others to buy this classic necklace from a Sotheby's auction for US$197,453 (approximately 1.41 million RMB). An insider said at the time: "Jin is honored to own the exquisite jewelry once worn by the late British Princess, which adds a new color to her collection of historical memorabilia." The pendant is the most dazzling part of this necklace, produced by Composed of square-cut amethysts and round-cut diamonds, the total weight of the diamonds is 5.25 carats. In fact, when the news of Jin buying this necklace appeared, it triggered a series of controversies. In view of her previous performance and personal image, people thought that Jin buying a necklace worn by Princess Diana was arty. . In addition, because she also broke a classic dress of Marilyn Monroe during her lifetime (Jin insisted that she did not wear it out), so people firmly believe that she does not deserve to have these special things, even if She can afford it. The original money could be used to match the necklace with an elegant evening dress to retaliate against people's previous criticism of her, but the reality is that she has to wear such a skirt, which is quite "discussing".
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-