Recently, a 29-year-old girl complained about being called "big sister" by the host while watching a talk show. The girl felt offended. The host quickly changed her name to "little sister" and she replied "fuck off". In response to this, the organizer of the relevant talk show responded: It immediately sent a private message to apologize and gave away two tickets. But the viewer said, "No tickets are needed, and this compensation cannot make up for my psychological trauma." The organizer of
later issued a statement on the situation, saying that the host made unintentional mistakes in the interaction and caused an unpleasant experience to the audience due to improper address, which caused the audience to leave early and caused some emotional harm. Open mic actors are all recruited from open sources. The actors' words do not represent the club's attitude, but the club deeply apologizes for causing a negative impact on the audience on stage. Open mic performances will be suspended in the near future and comprehensive rectification and optimization will be carried out, including but not limited to the training and supervision of hosts and the review of actors' manuscripts.
The "volume" of this matter is not large, but it has spread from "in the venue" to online and has become a hot spot on the Internet. Different views have been formed among netizens as to whether it is "the audience overreacted" or "the host is disrespectful". After intense discussion, this level of development is somewhat surprising. Thus, this phenomenon also presents an interesting perspective.
First, the host accidentally touched the shadowy "taboo of address". In terms of address, people like to be younger and hate to be called "old", which is a long-standing social psychology. In the market, it is true that people are called "uncle, aunt, eldest sister" and are displeased on the spot. On the contrary, such titles as "little brother, little sister" have become widely popular, and have even become a kind of "verbal bribery".
Whether a person's age is old enough to be called "eldest sister" is of course a matter of opinion and there is no unified standard. For example, I have been mistakenly called "Grandpa" and "young man" by others outside. In terms of individual feelings, people's likes and dislikes of titles should be respected, even if this preference may not be scientifically justified. In fact, there are relatively safe practices. For example, calling an adult "Ms., Sir" will basically not make a mistake.
Secondly, this matter is also related to stage culture and etiquette. watched the live video and found that the host randomly cueed this audience member during the performance. This kind of scene where on-site cues are used to enliven the atmosphere and extend the content of the performance is actually very common in variety shows and talk shows. The question is, what if the audience is unwilling and uncooperative? When people on stage are used to cueing the audience off the stage to form a certain conventional "culture", there will also be people who are "not interested" in this method.
Some people think that since the girl doesn’t want to be cueed, she should sit in the corner and not let the host notice. This logic is a bit taken for granted. As an audience, of course you have the right not to be cueed. Some people also believe that talk shows are "the art of offending." If you can't accept this and fall out on the spot, then don't watch it. It should be noted that there is a big difference between general "offense" and specific "offense". If you put yourself in the same situation, you may not be able to laugh it off.
Of course, a scene conflict like this may be a special case, but it also serves as a reminder that respecting the audience's experience during performances is never too much.
However, the host issued an invitation. Although the title was controversial, it was not appropriate to scold someone to "get lost" when she was called "big sister". After all, the host did not curse and apologized. The scene where the host was "choked" by the audience has essentially turned into a social behavior, showing their respective social etiquette.
Therefore, no matter how the angles and concepts diverge, it ultimately comes down to handling skills. The host explained on the spot that the lights on the scene were a little dim, which meant "I didn't see clearly". This was actually to smooth things over, and the audience who broke the guard should be tolerant. Similarly, the unrelenting criticism of this viewer on the Internet can be dismissed. In the final analysis, this incident is just a small accident, and onlookers do not need to be involved online.
Actually, you can think about the incident itself and the controversy that spread. Who broke the defense? When it comes to entertainment performances, audiences should be more tolerant.Of course we need to be vigilant and resist all kinds of "malicious intentions", but we don't have to tighten the string so tightly that we magnify small problems and get stuck in a corner. Talk shows are entertaining and suitable for all ages, but they cannot be perfect art. If there are "taboos" everywhere, it will also lead to actors being tied up on stage and unable to perform freely.
On the other hand, as the host involved mentioned in his apology note, although talk shows are called "offensive art", this does not mean that the feelings of others can be ignored. Performers need to grasp the scale of humor, improve their professional quality, and bring "relaxed" joy to the audience.
Recently, a 29-year-old girl complained about being called "big sister" by the host while watching a talk show. The girl felt offended. The host quickly changed her name to "little sister" and she replied "fuck off". In response to this, the organizer of the relevant talk show responded: It immediately sent a private message to apologize and gave away two tickets. But the viewer said, "No tickets are needed, and this compensation cannot make up for my psychological trauma." The organizer of
later issued a statement on the situation, saying that the host made unintentional mistakes in the interaction and caused an unpleasant experience to the audience due to improper address, which caused the audience to leave early and caused some emotional harm. Open mic actors are all recruited from open sources. The actors' words do not represent the club's attitude, but the club deeply apologizes for causing a negative impact on the audience on stage. Open mic performances will be suspended in the near future and comprehensive rectification and optimization will be carried out, including but not limited to the training and supervision of hosts and the review of actors' manuscripts.
The "volume" of this matter is not large, but it has spread from "in the venue" to online and has become a hot spot on the Internet. Different views have been formed among netizens as to whether it is "the audience overreacted" or "the host is disrespectful". After intense discussion, this level of development is somewhat surprising. Thus, this phenomenon also presents an interesting perspective.
First, the host accidentally touched the shadowy "taboo of address". In terms of address, people like to be younger and hate to be called "old", which is a long-standing social psychology. In the market, it is true that people are called "uncle, aunt, eldest sister" and are displeased on the spot. On the contrary, such titles as "little brother, little sister" have become widely popular, and have even become a kind of "verbal bribery".
Whether a person's age is old enough to be called "eldest sister" is of course a matter of opinion and there is no unified standard. For example, I have been mistakenly called "Grandpa" and "young man" by others outside. In terms of individual feelings, people's likes and dislikes of titles should be respected, even if this preference may not be scientifically justified. In fact, there are relatively safe practices. For example, calling an adult "Ms., Sir" will basically not make a mistake.
Secondly, this matter is also related to stage culture and etiquette. watched the live video and found that the host randomly cueed this audience member during the performance. This kind of scene where on-site cues are used to enliven the atmosphere and extend the content of the performance is actually very common in variety shows and talk shows. The question is, what if the audience is unwilling and uncooperative? When people on stage are used to cueing the audience off the stage to form a certain conventional "culture", there will also be people who are "not interested" in this method.
Some people think that since the girl doesn’t want to be cueed, she should sit in the corner and not let the host notice. This logic is a bit taken for granted. As an audience, of course you have the right not to be cueed. Some people also believe that talk shows are "the art of offending." If you can't accept this and fall out on the spot, then don't watch it. It should be noted that there is a big difference between general "offense" and specific "offense". If you put yourself in the same situation, you may not be able to laugh it off.
Of course, a scene conflict like this may be a special case, but it also serves as a reminder that respecting the audience's experience during performances is never too much.
However, the host issued an invitation. Although the title was controversial, it was not appropriate to scold someone to "get lost" when she was called "big sister". After all, the host did not curse and apologized. The scene where the host was "choked" by the audience has essentially turned into a social behavior, showing their respective social etiquette.
Therefore, no matter how the angles and concepts diverge, it ultimately comes down to handling skills. The host explained on the spot that the lights on the scene were a little dim, which meant "I didn't see clearly". This was actually to smooth things over, and the audience who broke the guard should be tolerant. Similarly, the unrelenting criticism of this viewer on the Internet can be dismissed. In the final analysis, this incident is just a small accident, and onlookers do not need to be involved online.
Actually, you can think about the incident itself and the controversy that spread. Who broke the defense? When it comes to entertainment performances, audiences should be more tolerant.Of course we need to be vigilant and resist all kinds of "malicious intentions", but we don't have to tighten the string so tightly that we magnify small problems and get stuck in a corner. Talk shows are entertaining and suitable for all ages, but they cannot be perfect art. If there are "taboos" everywhere, it will also lead to actors being tied up on stage and unable to perform freely.
On the other hand, as the host involved mentioned in his apology note, although talk shows are called "offensive art", this does not mean that the feelings of others can be ignored. Performers need to grasp the scale of humor, improve their professional quality, and bring "relaxed" joy to the audience.(Red Star News special commentator Bai Ju)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-