On August 20, certain circles of "film critics" exploded. I use double quotes here because I feel they are not worthy of being called film critics. Why are some circles of "film critics" so upset? Because Director Hu Mei wants to sue two film critics, and some "film critics" feel

What on earth is going on?

It was precisely because director Hu Mei wanted to sue these two film critics that some "film critic" circles exploded. The formation of cliques in some circles of "film critics" is no longer a matter of a day or two. This group of miscreants is no different from second-raters. It is really embarrassing for these film critic gangsters to criticize director Hu Mei.

I think that Director Hu Mei should be a civilized director and use the most civilized way to sue two film critics. Screenwriters, directors, producers, actors, etc., completed a film and television drama. The work was released, went on the stars, went online, and met the audience. At this time, the work of film critics and theater critics begins. Film critics and drama critics should use their own theoretical knowledge to discuss this work.

When chatting, you will definitely face the problem of negative or positive reviews. When you give a good review, everyone is usually happy. When giving negative reviews, there will definitely be writers, directors, actors, and producers who will be unhappy. At this time, does the unhappy party have an obligation to tolerate these comments? Of course, being able to tolerate it and not speaking out is a choice. But what if it can’t be tolerated? There can also be other paths to take.

For example, when the TV series "Fearless" was aired on the star, I wrote an article to discuss many unreasonable plots in its story. I thought that the quality of the drama was not good and it was not like a famous screenwriter like Zhao Dongling. Wrote it myself. Teacher Zhao Dongling, the screenwriter of the play, did not let me go. He directly used his social media account to post my things, and even sarcastically said that I cursed her to die early.

Of course I will not curse her to die early. This is moral common sense. Who would be so incompetent? Of course I won’t give in to Zhao Dongling either. A crappy show like "Fearless" should be enough for me to comment on it. Because Zhao Dongling does not accept criticism, I used the plots in this TV series to continue to find examples to prove the irrationality of the narrative logic. As a result, dozens of narrative logic illogicalities were found in "Fearless". Finally, Zhao Dongling dejectedly deleted the content that criticized me. I think she is also a person who wants to save face. After all, readers follow the content and pictures she posted, and they can read my article arguing that the various narrative logics of "Fearless" she wrote are unreasonable. She is the only one who is embarrassed. .

When I talk about this example I have experienced, I really want to prove that when writers and directors encounter negative reviews, they can confront film critics and drama critics. Of course, Zhao Dongling's "Fearless" this time was because the script itself was too poor, and Zhao didn't surpass me. However, Lao Zhao is still relatively civilized, that is, he just straightened up his writing and did nothing else.

I will add another example. I once reviewed a certain TV series negatively, and then I received a call from a self-proclaimed producer (staff member), threatening me with the underworld and sending young and Dangerous men to kill me. In fact, this is not a civilized method, and it is not as civilized as Teacher Zhao Dongling's "hanging on me". Film reviews and drama reviews are still exchanges in words. Take Young and Dangerous, it is the competition between Wing Chun Ip Man and the Japs.

In the face of negative reviews, screenwriters, directors, etc., of course there is no obligation to tolerate it, and you can choose to respond in a civilized way. Like Director Hu Mei, following legal procedures is a very civilized approach. If a film critic or a drama critic behaves and writes decently, they will not be afraid of "seeing them in court."

I have a civilized suggestion. When faced with negative reviews for their work, screenwriters and directors can go through judicial procedures. Instead of asking for sky-high compensation, etc., just ask for a public apology. This is not a case of the screenwriter and director bullying others just because they have money. In court, writers and directors can argue that film critics and theater critics were wrong to give bad reviews. Film critics and theater critics can also disprove the correctness of their own articles. It is very valuable to develop arguments, arguments and demonstrations in the legal field.

If everyone comes here, the film and drama review environment will be civilized. Some "film critics" are afraid of "seeing them in court". Are they hiding something secret? No wonder they fry the pan. I say this because I have been writing film and drama reviews for more than 20 years, and I have received many calls from "Young and Dangerous" people. I really want to have a civilized communication environment. See You in Court is a breath of fresh air that director Hu Mei has brought to the film critic circle. Film critics with a true sense of justice support director Hu Mei's approach.(Text/Ma Qingyun)