Just now, according to the exact news brought by French media rmc sports, although the Paris club denied that there was a fierce conflict between Mbappe and team president Nasser. However, an insider said that the two sides did have an argument in a box before the home game against Toulouse. Paris Saint-Germain denied this fact, perhaps out of concern for the team's image.
It is reported that before the game against Toulouse. Paris president Nasser, sporting director Campos and Mbappe met. Although the relationship between the two parties had been tense before, the purpose of this communication was to resolve their financial differences, so this was a forced meeting. According to RMC Sports, Nasser was aggressive from the beginning. He directly asked why Mbappe did not mention him in his personal farewell video. Because the French forward thanked almost every name that could be mentioned in the Paris club, except for the team chairman Nasser, it is self-evident what it means.
Players were dissatisfied with some of his actions, and he highlighted this by omitting to do so in his farewell video. Mbappe explained this, but what really caused a fierce conflict between the two sides was the subsequent disagreement on financial issues. Since Mbappe left the team as a free agent, he needs to compensate the club financially. The player team has been working on this issue before. He voluntarily gave up a loyalty bonus of approximately 80 million euros, which gave him the opportunity to continue playing normally in the team. In addition, Paris executives still hope to continue to receive some amount of compensation, which has caused dissatisfaction among the players.
rmc Sports broke the news that the reason why the two sides completely broke up this time was mainly because Nasser hoped to obtain half of the signing fee received by Mbappe. Because the French forward will receive a signing fee of more than 100 million euros after joining Real Madrid. Nasser hopes to receive half of it, which is about 50 million euros, to further compensate for the Paris Club's losses. Of course, this approach was a bit overreaching. The French star refused directly. A heated discussion broke out between the two parties and the negotiations eventually broke up.
Objectively speaking, it is normal for Paris to want Mbappe to further compensate for the funds. Because Paris spent nearly 180 million euros in transfer fees when purchasing Mbappe. Now that he is leaving the team as a free agent, it has indeed brought economic losses to the team. Paris must be unhappy if they don't get a penny of the transfer fee. In addition, the price required for the team to raise Mbappe every season is also very expensive. The media has previously exposed that Paris spends more than 200 million euros every year just to support Mbappe.
This includes a salary of more than 80 million euros before tax and a loyalty bonus of around 80 million euros per season. In addition, there are some floating bonuses and taxes to be paid for him, which can be said to be very expensive. Now, after several seasons, Mbappe has left the team with zero worth, which has indeed caused Paris a great loss. Therefore, in addition to asking Mbappe to give up his loyalty bonus, they also want to continue to receive a compensation of 50 million euros. However, this is something that he cannot understand as a player. Mbappe believes that he has informed the Paris senior management that he wants to leave the team. With the permission of the Paris senior management, there is no problem with his way of leaving the team.
What's more, in Mbappe's view, he has given up more than 80 million euros in loyalty bonuses, which has saved Paris a lot of money. At this time, the Paris senior management also wanted to get half of the signing fee he received, and he was unable to accept another 50 million euros. This was the focus of the conflict between the two parties. So in your opinion, is it right for Paris Saint-Germain to continue to demand compensation from Mbappe at this stage? Welcome to discuss in the comment area.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-