"Story of the Tang Dynasty" Douban scored a low 7.4, and the reasons for one star are mostly emotional and simple and rude

The

costume suspense fantasy web drama " Tang Dynasty Weird Stories " is coming to an end, and the Douban score finally came out, with a score of 7.4.


This score is a bit low for the plot of the play and the performances of the actors, and it should be more appropriate for this play to be above 8.5.

Although this drama is an online drama, its plot is ups and downs, the story is compact and not sloppy, and there are 8 small stories, each of which is independent, but there are some internal connections.

The 8 short stories are based on the 6 short stories currently broadcast. Each has its own characteristics and connotations, but without exception, they are all very exciting. It is unbearable to wait for the update of two episodes every night.

The story of "Chang'an Black Tea" focuses on reflecting that the human nature with insufficient people, insatiable desires and insatiable psychological distortions will not end well after all.


The story of "Stone Bridge" focuses on explaining the sinister hearts of people who are actually difficult to match under the false name.


The story of "Gan Tang Yi" vividly reveals the importance of people's kindness.


The story of "Huangmei Killing" reveals the truth that deformed love will eventually harm others and oneself.


The story of "Tuoshen" and the interpretation of "Chang'an Black Tea" are similar in meaning, both are the tragic end of the interpretation of human nature distortion.


The remaining "Human Mianhua" and "Tower of the Sky" are still on the air, and the full picture is unknown, so I won't comment, but from the perspective of the wonderful story of the whole drama, I believe it should also be wonderful.

Of course, Yu Lequan's one-sentence summary is inevitably biased and biased. In fact, each small story has a deeper interpretation and far-reaching significance, but each small story is entertaining and educational at the same time. Meaningful, thought-provoking, and inspiring.

Judging from the 6 short stories that have been broadcasted in this play, no matter from the wonderful plot, the online acting skills of the actors, the careful setting of the service, etc., the score should be above 8.5 points.


scored 7.4 points in the first wave of Douban scores, of which 5.2% of netizens gave the lowest one star.


Most of the reasons why some netizens give one star are directed at Yang Xuwen , who plays Lu Lingfeng, one of the male protagonists.


This part of the netizens will give a star as soon as they see Yang Xuwen as one of the male leads. Regardless of the plot, it is completely personal emotion.


The reason why Yang Xuwen is hated by these netizens is because of , Ren Jiao, , and some netizens who don't quite understand can find out about Ren Jiao on Baidu.


After the Ren Jiao case was investigated, it was publicly stated that it had nothing to do with Yang Xuwen.

Several years have passed, and some netizens are still brooding about this matter and talk about this drama, which is inevitably biased.


We can believe in the law of fairness and justice. Instead of acting with Yang Xuwen, we can't help but give this drama a one-star rating, which is very unfair to this drama.


Netizens rate a film and television drama, don't they look at the plot, story, acting and character interpretation, connotation and meaning, can they just look at the actor's face to give a very sloppy rating?


ifSuch a simple and crude rating, then the rating loses its reference value for measuring the pros and cons of a film and television drama, and it seems that the rating is very amateur and very low-level.



Maybe such a Douban score will not be worth it in the future, or every score given by Douban scores in the future must be reviewed, and the reasons for everyone's convincing must be listed, rather than subjective emotions, and a rude and simple list Ridiculous pretext.


Everyone aspires to love fairness and justice, but some netizens have made the mistake of doing what they don't want and "biased" others.

If everyone is running wild on the road of double standards, always being stricter than TA and treating themselves leniently, then fairness and justice will always be a slogan and an empty phrase.


As long as you stand in an objective point of view, seek truth from facts and treat everything with caution, you will come to the correct conclusion and give the most realistic and popular comments and evaluations.