have aroused extensive discussion among netizens. One is that "Gentlemen in the East Eighth District of " was removed from the shelves, and the other was that " Hidden into the Dust " was removed from the shelves. The former has a word-of-mouth score of 2.1, and the latter has a word-of-mouth score of 8.5. Both have been frequently pushed to hot searches due to various topics, so they have received a lot of attention.
I have never agreed with public opinion on the removal and removal of film and television dramas. Since I agreed to its broadcast or release at the beginning, it means that these film and television dramas were not found in the initial review process.
Therefore, even if tens of thousands of people complained about it after the broadcast, it should not be the reason for being taken off the shelves.
Watch or not watch, complain or praise, the decision rests with the audience. Now that you have allowed it to exist, and now you want to eliminate it, isn't this a slap in the face? Doesn't this make the audience suspect that there is a black box operation?
Although, I really think that some film and television dramas are very problematic, but if they have to be taken off the shelves, there must be a reasonable and compliant statement, rather than taking them off the shelves without a word. This is to let a hundred flowers bloom and a hundred schools of thought contend The trampling of development.
At this time, it is necessary to trace the source back to the problem itself. Why would anyone allow the appearance of these off-the-shelf works?
Take "Gentlemen of the East Eighth District" as an example. Zhang Han wrote and directed it. According to his words, this work can be said to be a sword for ten years, and almost all the effort is spent on it. .
It stands to reason that Zhang Han has said this, and he should treat this drama with sincerity. At least the script will strive for perfection, and strive to make a good work about "Hu drifting".
backfired. The audience complained just after the first broadcast. The exaggerated stories were seriously out of life, the greasy characters were very embarrassing, and what was more serious was the insult and contempt for women. In the lines of
, the relationship between men and women is never treated from an equal perspective, and women are even treated as so-called prey. All kinds of frivolous lines are full of insults. The actors are making jokes about women so lightly that they don't see anything wrong with what they're saying. In
's actions, Zhang Han's repeated actions, such as pulling the bra straps and touching his breasts, molested women under the guise of filming, Wang Xiaochen would be considered cheap if he didn't sue him.
Therefore, the audience of the 40-episode TV series complained from the beginning to the end, which also greatly increased the popularity of this show. Some people say that black and red are also red, which is true, and the platform has not interfered.
However, a few days after the broadcast, the show was suddenly taken off the shelves, with no feature film, only some behind-the-scenes footage.
I admit that there are too many problems in this show, and even the values are too distorted. It should not be given a chance to be reviewed, and it should not be broadcast on various platforms.
But why did the platform take it off the shelves? Is it because of public pressure? Then why did you buy it in the first place? Why let it air again? Shouldn't this kind of bad drama be strangled directly in the cradle?
and the movie "Hidden in the Dust" were also taken off the shelves. What's the reason? For example, "Gentlemen of the East Eighth District" was taken off the shelves because of the pressure of public opinion, so what about "Hidden in the Dust"?
Many people applaud the bad dramas being taken off the shelves, but the reputation is low, they are criticized, and there is a lot of pressure from public opinion. It should not be the reason for being taken off the shelves. This will destroy our film and television drama market.
At this time, what we should pay more attention to is, how does the mechanism of our film and television review work? So many rubbish movies and TV dramas have been released, and so many excellent works have been frozen. What is the reason? Which part went wrong?
I raise both hands in favor of not giving bad dramas a chance to air, but I have to ask who gave the green light to bad dramas?
is just like some video platforms are full of a lot of shoddy online movies, you can't even call them movies, and who made them broadcast? After the broadcast, the limelight was wrong and disappeared. Is this the normal development market for film and television dramas?
A dozen or even a few people decided that a billion people shouldWhat to watch, the development of Chinese film and television dramas has a long way to go.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-