" Gentlemen in the East Eighth District " claims to be a work that has been polished for ten years, but people fail to see where the sincerity of this work is reflected. The
dramas are full of old-fashioned overbearing president plots. Such an old stalk should already be sour, and it can't be rotten any more. It's pointless to waste the audience's time with such an old routine. In
dramas, various labels are always attached to urban women. Those should be thought up by screenwriters and directors. In real life, there is no such thing at all.
Zhang Han 's hand has become one of the special attention points of this drama. Especially in the recent episode, when Zhang Han pulled the heroine Wang Xiaochen to lean on him, Zhang Han's hand was obviously placed on Wang Xiaochen's special part, and Zhang Han's hand stayed on it for at least a few seconds. , and then wrapped his arms around Wang Xiaochen's waist.
Actually, in this case, there have been the same embarrassing scenes before. That is when Zhang Han was the hero in the play to save the beauty, Zhang Han held the belt on Wang Xiaochen's back with one hand. A scene like
also aroused heated discussion among the crowd. You know, although Zhang Han's film is a comedy, it is vulgar, and it doesn't match comedy at all. Did the director and screenwriter fail to understand what comedy really is?
's handling of these shots is also criticized, they just deleted these shots. Is it deleted, as if it never happened?
used to say that how the actors act in the play is completely according to the arrangement of the director and the screenwriter, but now Zhang Han is also a screenwriter, so he can't put the blame on others.
Zhang Han has a lot of responsibility this time. When filming, what did Zhang Han think, so many people looked at it, do so many people think that the scene is good? It's just that they dare not speak out because of the director's and screenwriter's face.
's "Gentlemen in the East Eighth District", the word of mouth plummeted, falling only 2.2 points. It can be seen that the audience is very dissatisfied with this play and has a lot of opinions. Otherwise, this score is too low, and even passing grades are not on the sidelines.
This is very curious, what happened to Zhang Han? A drama that has been polished for ten years, it is such a work, it is really incomprehensible.
, what efforts have they made in the past ten years? But the effort they put in is not seen at all in the play. The plot is old-fashioned, with no new ideas at all, and no sincerity.
Zhang Han has been an old actor who has been filming for 15 years. After graduating in 2007, he started filming. In terms of filming, the experience should be quite rich, but how could such a low-level mistake be made? Logically speaking, this should not be the case.
Some people said that maybe it was deliberate. They wanted to use these controversial actions to make this drama attract everyone's attention. Anyway, black and red are also red, and it is enough to have heat and discussion. Maybe that's what the director and screenwriter thought too. As a screenwriter,
should pay attention to every aspect. They all say that it is a work that has been polished for ten years, so it should be able to reflect the sincerity of the work, rather than just talking with one mouth.
As the saying goes, art comes from life, but it is higher than life. But you can't create without life, instead of moving yourself with a bunch of plots, it's meaningless.
audiences need to be real enough, but also resonate in the real. If there is a special creativity, it will be even more surprising. The so-called surprise is not that kind of exaggerated performance, but something that can really appear in real life and can be felt by ordinary people.
Zhang Han should still reflect on himself. Why didn't he notice these problems when he was shooting? Did he really not notice it, or did he deliberately do it.
only works with sincerity in order to win the favor of the audience. Since it is said to be a ten-year work, there should be enough surprises to bring the audience, rather than the mediocre works seen today.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-