Introduction
227 After the incident, Xiao Zhan commissioned a lawyer to represent the rights protection case. After that, something strange happened. The leader of the boycott of Xiao Zhan, "Pumpkin" (using the nickname of the account), filed it with Xiao Zhan Studio and Weibo. The lawsuit was filed on the grounds that the right of reputation was violated by Xiao Zhan Studio and Weibo officials.
Recently, "Pumpkin" announced on his personal account that he sued Xiao Zhan studio and Weibo's reputation dispute case, which attracted heated discussions among netizens. This melon is indeed a bit big! The
pumpkin public subpoena satirizes Xiao Zhan’s studio and Xiao Zhan fans. Xiao Zhan’s case is about to start.
"Pumpkin" is one of the leaders in boycotting Xiao Zhan. He has repeatedly posted boycott messages on Weibo. Due to his strong words, With the intention of instigating netizens to maliciously slander others, the account has been blocked on Weibo many times, and now "Pumpkin" has published these remarks on other platforms.
Xiao Zhan entrusted a lawyer to deal with this incident after the 227 incident, and "Pumpkin" also sued Xiao Zhan studio and Weibo. Many netizens did not know why "Pumpkin" sued Xiao Zhan and Weibo. In fact, To put it bluntly, I found an excuse for my defamatory behavior. This excuse is to use my own strength to oppose the irrational star-chasing behavior of the fan circle, and it has risen to the inaction of the star himself and failed to guide fans to do positive things in time.
If the excuse of "pumpkin" is seen by unknown passers-by, there seems to be a kind of hateful heroic style, but as an insider of the whole incident, this is just a farce for "pumpkin" to deceive itself. Before the "pumpkin" slander Xiao Zhan, there were also many cases of slandering celebrities in their own name, such as the plain people slandering Yang Zi, the plain people slandering Wu Yifan, etc. These incidents have also been dealt with by the judiciary, and the result of the judiciary's handling of the star is malicious. Defamation of a star requires compensation for loss of reputation and a public apology to the star.
stars are also ordinary people. They also have the right to be protected by law. They cannot be obliged to swallow their voices just because they are public figures. As public figures, they should learn to use legal weapons to protect their rights from harm, and they don’t need to abuse each other. Let the law resolve everything. This is the correct way to handle things. The measures taken by celebrities such as Xiao Zhan, Yang Zi, Wu Yifan and others when they encounter problems are correct, and they have set an example for the majority of netizens. Whether it is online slander or real-life slander, we all need to use legal weapons to protect ourselves, and don't let online violence infringe our rights and harm ourselves.
Recently, "Pumpkin" has published the subpoena information on his personal social account. You can see the opening time of the case of Pumpkin and Xiao Zhan in the information. This is just the beginning. Xiao Zhan sued the professional black hand for infringement of his rights. The case is also proceeding in an orderly manner. According to Xiao Zhan’s lawyer, the time for the trial is approaching. The case between Xiao Zhan and the professional black hand is a criminal case and involves a lot of information. Many people have not verified their real names online or Posting slanderous remarks with other people’s identity accounts requires detailed investigation by relevant departments, but we have to believe in the law, in justice, and the law net is restored without leakage. When all these materials are collected, the Xiao Zhan case will open.
"Pumpkin" posted a subpoena on the Internet. In order to show its authenticity, it was accompanied by text. The text also insinuates Xiao Zhan’s studio and Xiao Zhan fans. Personal freedom of speech, we can’t influence anyone to speak. But the malicious slander has indeed touched the law, and whether it is right or not everything is waiting for the law to decide.
Conclusion
"Pumpkin" publicly released the subpoena information on his personal social account. There is no problem with this behavior itself, but his attitude towards the law makes people embarrassed. The law is not a trifle. The truth is that anyone who touches the law will definitely Subject to the sanctions they deserve, the personnel involved in 227 can not just rely on a subpoena to settle the matter. I believe that justice will arrive sooner or later, and the relevant personnel will also be punished by law and wait for the results.
The topic of discussion in this issue: Xiao Zhan's case will surely be handled fairly by relevant departmentsManagement, sued
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-