An in-depth analysis of the "227 Xiao Zhan incident" by a user of Lao Tianya

is excerpted from an article written by Miss Wenbing on May 29th on Weibo. I think it is very well written, and I hope I can turn it around.

1. Is there any capital behind " Xiao Zhan"?

Answer: There must be. But "capital" is a neutral word.

(Don’t tell me that you don’t know that “capital” is a neutral word. The non-neutral word is the XXXX system. This sense of direction is really to be vigilant)

A project with a high return on investment will inevitably attract capital to compete Investment, how hard it is to find unicorn companies!

Is Xiao Zhan a fake traffic deliberately encountered by capital, or is it a unicorn who has been favored by "angel investors" to place bets in advance?

Isn’t it clear from his life experience and debut experience?

Graduated from college, interbank senior draft? Debut? Isn't this an accident of "breaking into the entertainment circle"?

From the corner of the background board to the small supporting role, Xiao Zhan met angel investors.

Chen Qingling, Zhuxian, Douluo Dalu, and Yu Sheng are obviously investors who are investing in the "best in the mud" and betting on "loan explosion".

For investment, this kind of risk-return project opportunity is already good. It is not necessary to set up a "capital coffee" for a child from an ordinary middle-class family in the city, and we are not blind.

2. Is Xiao Zhan a human?

Answer: Xiao Zhan is a traffic idol product produced by the capital game (intrinsic meaning: Xiao Zhan is not a person)

You see, the magic of discourse is brainwashed here, and the evil of mediocrity is born from this: "Xiao Zhan" is a commodity-Xiao War is not human. This is how concepts are replaced. Then you can yell at a "commodity" without any psychological burden! No guilt, no discomfort, loss of human empathy, doing evil and complacent.

's most disgusting and white-lotus statement is "the social person Xiao Zhan is unemployed and retires, the natural person Xiao Zhan is safe and happy".

Let me go. Can the "social attributes" and "natural attributes" of people be separated? If you want to bully and destroy a person, you don't need to be so high-sounding. Disgusting opens the door to disgusting fucking again. (A person's social and natural attributes are inseparable) I saw someone use the word "sacrifice" Xiao Zhan, Ning also knows "sacrifice", is Xiao Zhan a sacrifice of which Xie cult? If Xiao Zhan was not a near-perfect victim in this matter, if his flaws were bigger, he would have been trampled on the ground, even though the value logic that trampled him on the ground was incorrect.

227 You see what you have picked up, picking up an innocent idol, it is more reliable than a political trial. After the incident, when Baijia rushed to eat the flesh and blood, he probably thought that the battle would be over within a few days. No one expected that it would be absolutely impossible to pick up a little angel and force people to reveal anonymous donations. Yes, although he apologized for his kouhi on Weibo when he was a amateur, but as far as the melons I ate, the kouhi under those friend scenes was really harmless.