(Original title: People's Sharp Comment: How can the battlefield of the anti-epidemic battle be a "show field"?)
According to reports, a doctor complained in a circle of friends, and the director of the emergency department of a hospital left angrily at a meeting. The reason was leaders at all levels. I went to the hospital for three meetings, each time I read the latest documents and policies, and cheered up the medical staff. It took about 3 hours... The leader of
went to the hospital for a three-hour meeting. The head of the emergency department left the meeting angrily. When it comes to the formalism in the prevention and control of the epidemic, it is easy for people to think of endless forms. In fact, there is another form of formalism that has been criticized. The mobilization meeting with loud slogans, the "welcome to the inspection battle" changed into tricks, wherever you leave marks in advance to expose your results...do less work, talk more, perform more; beat gongs and drums, gongs and drums are noisy for fear The world does not know.
Epidemic prevention and control is a battlefield, not a show. In the prevention and control of the epidemic, it is understandable to create a "sense of ritual" and to expose the workload. It is natural to ask for praise, but too much is too late. If the main focus is on "sense of existence", on "competing for fame and fortune", and on how to gain attention and "achieve results"...speaking of small things is sensationalism, going off the track, and talking about the big It is a hindrance to the war and the epidemic. The more critical moment
is, the more we can test the original mission of the cadre, and the more we can see the quality of the cadre's will. Facing the war of the epidemic, hard work is most needed, not futility; real tricks are most needed, rather than superficial essays, and pragmatism is most needed, not a face-saving game of cheating. After all, these cannot stand the test of practice, and it is only a matter of time before they are exposed.
's show performance, in the final analysis, is a floating style, which is essentially a problem of thinking. In addition to strengthening the work style, it is also necessary to build a more scientific assessment mechanism. In the specific assessment, look at the actual results instead of looking at the table, and reuse the people who do the work, not the people who are good at making superficial things. Those who are accustomed to doing "flower work" should break it in time, and even take it seriously. The prevention and control of the
epidemic is at the most strenuous and critical stage, and there is no room for "beating gongs and drums" to create momentum. Only by taking the lead and supporting the real words, behaved honestly and steadfastly, raced at the same time and battled with the disease, can we be considered responsible and fulfill our mission, and we can win the battle against epidemic prevention and control as soon as possible. Editor in charge: Qin Lumin
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-