Nine episodes of "Everything is Good" have been deleted and the plot has been rushed, and five plots in the original work have been modified too much

To be honest, when watching the finale of "Everything is Good", the editor saw Su Daqiang holding the review materials in one hand, Ming Yu in the other hand, and the video of the family. I was moved by tears, but did you guys have any? With this feeling, is the plot reversal a bit too fast? Just now, there are still deep contradictions, and the next episode will be completely washed out.

In fact, the reason is very simple. The original plot was not so rushed. In fact, the plot is nine more episodes than the current one. However, nine episodes have been deleted due to review issues, and the TV series has been changed to the original, so the plot development has been hasty. Many, the editor found that there are five plots in the original work that have been modified a lot, and these five plots are the key part of the development.

first, Su Daqiang washed white; after Su’s mother passed away, Su Daqiang turned on the death mode, and after making trouble with Su Ming, he began to bother Su Mingzhe and Su Mingzhe. Su Mingyu was also involved in a problem with Shi Tiandong. A father who is responsible, hides when something happens, and cries at every turn, definitely cannot be developed in a day or two, but Su Daqiang suddenly changed sex due to illness. Is this change a bit too fast? In fact, many things happened in the original book without explanation.

Second, Su Mingcheng was whitewashed; the conflicts between the Su brothers and sisters began when they were young. The reason is that Su's mother blindly condoned Su Mingcheng. In the play, the two quarreled at every turn. Su Mingcheng almost killed his sister. This is already a deep hatred. The contradiction between the two, but also because of the reconciliation of two or three things, Su Mingcheng's whitewashing process is better than Su Daqiang's whitewashing, but it is still somewhat hasty.

Third, Su Mingcheng was punished for the first time; Su Mingcheng was seriously injured because of Julie’s work, and because of pleas, Mingyu told Su Mingcheng to regret the book and record the video. After his release from prison, Su Mingcheng was depressed. At that time, the editor wondered about reading the book of regret and recording the video? He also said that Su Mingyu was a poisonous jellyfish and it took a long time to recover.

In fact, in the original work, Su Mingcheng was mentally abnormal after he was released from prison. On the other hand, he was beaten badly by other people during the detention center. It can be said that he was tortured. That's why he was mentally abnormal after he was released. Very hasty.

Fourth, the identities of Shi Tiandong and Archie; the play suggests that Shi Tiandong, that is, Mingyu’s boyfriend is not simple, and Archie does not look like ordinary people regardless of his style and appearance, but until the plot In the end, it is the restaurant owner and waiter. Although Shi Tiandong is the gilt prince in the original book, it is not mentioned in the plot after all. It may be that the identities of Shi Tiandong and Archie are not important.

Fifth, Mingyu and Su’s mother reconciled; Su Daqiang became more and more ill in the play, but he was very clear about the previous events, especially the ending Su Daqiang ran to buy a workbook for Mingyu, making Mingyu cry. This is the real reconciliation between Mingyu and Su's father, but what about Su's mother and Mingyu's relationship?

The last episode of the plot was that Mingyu was bullied by Su Mingcheng when Mingyu was a few years old, and Su's mother comforted Mingyu and said that she would teach Su Mingcheng, while holding Mingyu, indicating that Su's mother still loved Mingyu very much. It shows that Mingyu and Su's mother finally reconciled. Why did Su's mother change so much towards Mingyu? As well as how Mingyu knew the reason, there was not much explanation in the play. It is very common for TV series adapted from the novel of the same name to appear in

. After all, it is impossible to shoot it without error. In addition, there are still some inappropriate content in the review, which is very different from the original.