Recently, musician Wang Jinlan reported that all-round musician Dao Lang plagiarized his work, causing an uproar on the Internet. This report quickly attracted the attention and discussion of millions of netizens, and also made Wang Jinlan, who was not well known before, become t

Recently, musician Wang Jinlan reported in real name that versatile musician Dao Lang plagiarized his works, causing an uproar on the Internet. This report quickly attracted the attention and discussion of millions of netizens, and also made Wang Jinlan, who was not well known before, become the focus of public opinion overnight.

However, as Wang Jinlan posted the so-called creative manuscript, netizens discovered many loopholes in it, making the truth of this incident even more confusing.

Wang Jinlan claimed in the report that Daolang had plagiarized as many as 20 of her original works, including the well-known song "Waiting at the Sad Bar at Two in the Morning". In order to prove his statement, Wang Jinlan specially posted the creative manuscript of this song.

However, the exposure of this manuscript did not become the strong evidence for Wang Jinlan’s rights protection as Wang Jinlan hoped. Instead, it became the focus of doubts among netizens.

First of all, judging from the paper of the manuscript, there are obvious doubts. Wang Jinlan claimed that she created this manuscript thirty years ago, but the paper is as new as ever, with no signs of yellowing or aging. You know, even if the paper is well preserved, after thirty years of baptism, it will inevitably leave some traces of time.

What's more, the time when A4 paper was widely used in our country's government documents was roughly around 2000. Thirty years ago, Wang Jinlan claimed, A4 paper had not yet become mainstream, let alone such a well-preserved paper.

Secondly, the content of the manuscript also makes people suspicious. Although the manuscript clearly states "Wang Jinlan as lyricist and Wang Jinlan as composer", there is no trace of music score other than the lyrics.

For a song, the score and lyrics complement each other. Without the score, the song cannot be fully presented. Could it be that Wang Jinlan had the miraculous ability to write complete lyrics directly without the need for music scores thirty years ago?

In addition, the lyrics in the manuscript are word for word, without any trace of modification, which is also contrary to the common sense of repeated deliberation and careful consideration in the song creation process.

What is even more incredible is that the words "This song was illegally covered by Dao Lang Luo Lin and included in the "Do Lang 2" record appeared at the end of the manuscript."

This makes people wonder: Thirty years ago, how did Wang Jinlan predict that his songs would be copied by a musician named Luo Lin, and also knew the name of his album? This is simply a prediction of the future!

As netizens deeply analyzed the manuscript, more and more loopholes were exposed one by one. This so-called creative manuscript not only failed to become a powerful weapon for Wang Jinlan to defend her rights, but instead became ironclad evidence for her to falsely accuse others. Many netizens said that Wang Jinlan's move not only damaged Daolang's reputation, but also destroyed the good atmosphere in the music industry.

In this storm, Daolang has undoubtedly become the most innocent victim. He has always been loved by the general public as an all-round musician. He can write lyrics, compose music, sing, and post-produce. Many of his works are completed by himself.

Now he was suddenly accused of such groundless accusations, which caused a big blow to his reputation and career.

Faced with this sudden storm, Daolang chose silence and calmness. He did not rush to refute or defend, but chose to use time and facts to prove his innocence. He knew that the truth would be revealed one day, and he was willing to wait for that day to come.

Looking back on the whole incident, we can’t help but reflect: In the Internet age, everyone has the right to speak out, but speaking out does not mean that you can falsely accuse others at will. Before reporting, you must have enough evidence to support your statement, otherwise you will be like Wang Jinlan and pay a heavy price because of impulsiveness and ignorance.

At the same time, we should also look at various events and remarks on the Internet more rationally. We should not blindly follow the trend or believe easily, but use our own judgment and common sense to distinguish the truth from the false. Only in this way can we jointly maintain a healthy and harmonious network environment.