Compared with the educational anxiety that some people feel when they first see a "genius resume", the trust anxiety and fairness anxiety caused by this incident may be more worthy of response. Recently, a resume has attracted the attention of the domestic science and technology

Compared with the educational anxiety that some people felt when they first saw the "genius resume", the trust anxiety and fairness anxiety caused by this incident may be more worthy of response

Recently, a resume attracted the attention of the domestic technology community. The resume claims that He, a 16-year-old middle school student, has become "the senior director of the Youth Science and Technology Research Studio of the China Association for Science and Technology" and has become "a member of the Chinese Astronautical Society, a member of the Chinese Bioengineering Society, and a member of the Chinese Mechanical Engineering Society." In this regard, relevant staff of the China Association for Science and Technology made it clear that there is no such studio under the China Association for Science and Technology, and He has nothing to do with the China Association for Science and Technology.

may have a "guilty conscience", and the "Home of Science and Technology Workers" webpage involved can no longer be opened. But now that it has attracted so much public attention, some issues cannot be “settled away” and need to be clarified in order to set the record straight.

If it is a fake resume, why does it appear on a relatively formal and somewhat official website? According to media reports, relevant staff of China Science and Technology Circle (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd., the operator of "Science and Technology Workers' Home", said that the website is a subsidiary of China Science and Technology Press Co., Ltd. As for why He's outrageous resume appeared , and he didn’t know the whole story. "Unclear" does not mean that it cannot be clarified. This kind of resume introduction is different from ordinary typos or grammatical problems. Whether there are insiders in who did it deliberately and whether there are interests involved in it is worthy of further investigation.

If it were just the students themselves "posting it for fun" on their personal social accounts, I believe not many people would take it seriously, and it would be impossible to attract such great attention from the media and the public. The key point of this incident is that there is an additional layer of endorsement from the "official" platform, which makes people feel absurd but cannot completely ignore the seriousness of it. In any case, the institutional platform where the resume is posted should give an explanation.

Another question is, have the relevant personnel used these false resumes to defraud, or obtained improper benefits from them? In addition, if part of He's identity is certified or granted by an authoritative organization, does such grant comply with the corresponding normative procedures and does it match He's actual ability? There are 10,000 question marks in the public mind. These questions and subconscious speculations have converged into fierce public opinion, testing the response capabilities of the departments and institutions involved.

Judging from the information on the resume, the school He attended is clear. The media also interviewed Guangdong Experimental Middle School Liwan School. The latter stated that the student involved had graduated and the school had not hired him to become a researcher at Guangdong Experimental Middle School Liwan School. Push release It is the student's personal behavior. However, how could a 16-year-old boy get such ability?

In addition to the introduction on the "Home of Science and Technology Workers" website, a WeChat public account called "Small Speaker for Youth Scientific Research Activities in Li Province" also published articles introducing He's various "legends" and even his participation in designing rocket plans. The official account also introduced the information of "deputy senior" Li Moumou, Tan Moumou and others. If there is no responsibility on the part of the school, is it the parents who lied for their children?

As a minor, if He completely faked it on his own, it could still be said to be a prank, but if it was planned by his parents, elders or other stakeholders, He might also be a victim. Putting aside the impact of this wave of public opinion questioning on his life growth, if a child becomes a tool for adults to cheat and falls into the whirlpool of fame and fortune early on, then what awaits him may not necessarily be a bright future. .

In recent years, there has been an influx of "genius boys" from time to time in the public opinion field. Some of them are real. People envy "other people's" children and usually send them blessings. However, there are also some "genius boys" who fail to withstand doubts. Artificial fraud often exists, which harms social fairness and justice on the one hand, and harms the social trust ecosystem on the other. In particular, some of them are mixed with people's imagination of power, money, connections and other black-box operations.

Therefore, "delete" or "withdraw" should not be the end of this matter. There are still too many question marks that have not been straightened. Compared with the educational anxiety that some people felt when they first saw the "genius resume", the trust anxiety and fairness anxiety caused by this incident may be more worthy of response.

Red Star News Special Commentator Zhai Li

Editor Yin Shuguang

Red Star Comment Submission Email: [email protected]