The "Victory Plan" that Ukrainian President Zelenskiy has been hyping frequently recently has finally surfaced, and its content is so bold that it is staggering. Zelensky has high hopes for this plan, hoping to lead Ukraine to victory through it. However, can the truth really go

The "Victory Plan" that Ukrainian President Zelenskiy has been frequently hyping recently has finally surfaced. Its content is so bold that it is staggering. Zelensky has high hopes for this plan, hoping to lead Ukraine to victory through it. However, can the truth really go as he wishes?

Previously, Zelensky had kept this plan a tight secret, allowing only U.S. Secretary of State Blinken to see it, and planning to take it to the United States to show it to Biden, Harris and others. Now, with Zelensky’s visit to the United States, the full picture of the “Victory Plan” has finally been made public. However, after reading the entire plan, many people called it "whimsical".

Originally, the outside world thought that the "Victory Plan" was an upgraded version of the "Ten Points for Peace" previously proposed by Zelenskiy and was a preparation for peace talks. However, the Russian response revealed that they were also "cheated" by this plan.

According to multiple media reports, Zelensky’s speech at the United Nations General Assembly made it clear that the “Victory Plan” was not for peace talks, but to force Russia to make concessions through military means. The practical actions he proposed include attacking the Russian mainland, destroying Russian energy facilities, and seeking long-term military support from the West.

Ukraine has actually been trying these actions in the past few months. For example, they asked the West to allow the use of long-range weapons to strike deep into Russia, and they did not hesitate to launch a fierce offensive in Kursk or even abandon the eastern front. However, these actions did not have the desired effect.

Zelensky’s “Victory Plan” seems ambitious, but in fact it is full of unrealistic illusions. The offensive in Kursk has been curbed, making it difficult for the Ukrainian army to continue advancing, and has even been pushed back. It is undoubtedly a foolish dream to exchange Kursk for the land of Udong.

As for the issue of attacking Russia in depth, Ukraine’s own military capabilities are limited and it is difficult to pose a serious threat to Russia. Western countries have always maintained a conservative attitude on this issue and dare not take risks easily. Therefore, Zelensky’s “Victory Plan” is to a large extent just trying to impress the West.

Russia has a very firm attitude towards Zelensky’s “Victory Plan”. Kremlin spokesman Peskov made it clear that trying to force Russia to accept peace is a fatal mistake, a systemic mistake and a profound misunderstanding. He emphasized that peace negotiations are possible only on the premise of ensuring Russia's security and achieving the goals of special military operations.

Russia’s response revealed strong dissatisfaction and indignation against the “Victory Plan”. This also indicates that the situation may further escalate, and Russia may respond to Zelenskiy’s provocation with actual actions on the battlefield.

Zelensky’s “Victory Plan” is undoubtedly a big gamble. He tried to force Russia to make concessions through military means, but this method is not only extremely risky, but may also lead to further deterioration of the situation.