Recently, reporters learned from the Tianyancha app that Lin Shengbin and China Eastern Airlines Co., Ltd.-related privacy and personal information protection dispute cases have added a new second-instance hearing announcement. The appellant is China Eastern Airlines Co., Ltd., and the case will be held on July 10 The trial was held in Shanghai No. 1 Intermediate People's Court.
Subsequently, #Eastern Airlines filed an appeal against Lin Shengbin’s privacy case# became the first hot search topic.
Case process information shows that the first instance of the case has been heard several times last year and this year.
Previous report:
In June 2017, the "nanny arson incident" in Hangzhou resulted in the death of a mother and three children, which attracted widespread attention. After the incident, there were voices saying that "Lin Shengbin, the husband of the hostess who died, is suspected of committing the crime." Lin Shengbin told the media at the time that he flew from Guangzhou to Hangzhou in the early morning of the incident and was not at the crime scene.
director and writer Liu Xinda has been following the case for a long time and is skeptical of Lin Shengbin's above remarks.
On the morning of November 19, 2021, Liu Xinda posted on his Weibo account with more than one million fans: "Liu Xinda has called all airlines, including China Eastern Airlines, Air China, China Southern Airlines, etc., on June 22, 2017 On that day and in the previous days, no record of Lin Shengbin's flight was found. In other words, during the arson incident, Lin Shengbin said that he was on a business trip in Guangzhou, which was a complete lie. "
That night, Liu Xinda posted on Weibo again, saying, "China Eastern Airlines. No flight record of Lin Shengbin in June 2017 was found," and a recording of a call between him and China Eastern Airlines staff was attached, which lasted 11 minutes and 52 seconds. The call recording shows that Liu Xinda said to the China Eastern Airlines staff, "Let me check Lin Shengbin's flight records in June 2017." After the airline staff replied "There are no records in June 2017," Liu Xinda continued to check Lin Shengbin's flight records from 2015 to 2021. flight records, and the other party replied with the itinerary information for the above time period.
Soon, netizens discovered that the Weibo post with the recording was no longer visible. The next morning, Liu Xinda posted on Weibo that he had not deleted the China Eastern Airlines recording, but had temporarily set the recording to be visible only to himself.
Judicial materials obtained by Red Star News indicate that an earlier recording of a call between Liu Xinda and a China Eastern Airlines staff member showed that Liu Xinda said "there are a few friends who want to check together", saying that he reported Lin Shengbin's name in order to check the status of flight mileage points. , ID number, and reported multiple addresses for identity verification.
Liu Xinda told Red Star News that Lin Shengbin’s identity information was provided by netizens. He publicly posted the recording of the call with China Eastern Airlines on the Internet to “expose Lin Shengbin’s lies.” At the same time, he also reported the relevant situation to the judicial authorities with his real name.
In May 2022, Lin Shengbin took China Eastern Airlines Co., Ltd. and Beijing Weimeng Chuangke Network Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Weimeng Company"), the operating company of the Weibo platform, to court. During the trial, Lin Shengbin applied to add Liu Xinda as a co-defendant and withdrew the lawsuit against China Eastern Airlines Co., Ltd.
▲Lin Shengbin
However, according to Tianyancha legal proceedings information, Lin Shengbin once sued China Eastern Airlines Co., Ltd. due to privacy and personal information protection disputes. The case has issued court opening announcements many times, and the court hearing the case is Pudong District, Shanghai. People's Court.
In addition, in January this year, the court ruled that Liu Xinda had violated Lin Shengbin’s privacy rights in the case of director Liu Xinda’s inquiry and publication of Lin Shengbin’s flight records. Liu Xinda was dissatisfied with the verdict and believed that his inquiry and publication of Lin Shengbin's travel records was legitimate public opinion supervision, so he filed an appeal. According to previous reports, the court has notified him to hold talks on relevant online infringement liability disputes on May 6.
Source: Comprehensive Red Star News previous reports, Xiaoxiang Morning News
